The Strategic Use of Inventories in Procurement Contracts
K. Anand, R. Anupindi and Y. Bassok
*** Abstract ****
The literature on contract theory has mostly focused on models -- static or
dynamic- without inventories. On the other hand, inventory theory has been developed
primarily within a single decision-maker optimization framework. This paper
bridges these two streams of research by studying the role of inventories in
a dynamic procurement contract between a supplier and a buyer. In the model,
the buyer may carry inventory across periods. Under zero fixed costs, zero lead
times, no uncertainty, and stationary demand, all the classical reasons for
inventories are eliminated. Yet (as we prove), the buyer's optimal strategy
in equilibrium is to carry inventories, and the supplier is unable to prevent
this. These inventories arise out of purely {\em strategic} considerations not
identified before in the literature, and have a significant impact on the equilibrium
solution, as well as supplier, buyer and channel profits. We find that strategic
inventories are eliminated if the supplier can preempt the buyer's gaming behavior
by committing early to wholesale prices. We compare the performance of such
commitment contracts with (uncommitted) dynamic contracts. We extend the case
of linear wholesale prices to two-part tariff procurement contracts, and demonstrate
that strategic inventories continue to play a pivotal role. When the buyer can
carry inventories strategically, two-part tariffs do not lead to optimal channel
performance, nor can the supplier extract away all of the channel profits. Our
results imply that firms can and must carry inventories strategically, and that
the ability to carry inventories is an important factor in optimal contract
design. Finally, we show that the ability to carry inventories significantly
affects the equilibrium outcome, regardless of whether inventories are actually
carried by the buyer in equilibrium even under arbitrary contract spaces facing
general demand functions for longer horizons.